Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Neural Foundry's avatar

Exceptional analysis that captures both the strategic and tactical picture beautifully. The way you frame LLY vs NVO as "trend-following vs mean-reversion" rather than a binary choice is incredibly helpfull for portfolio construction. What strikes me most is the fundamental divergence: LLY accepting near-term FCF compression (9% vs 22%) to build capacity and extend the Twincretin moat, while NVO optimizes current cash conversion (220x interest coverage!) but faces tighter liquidity. The technical setup you've outlined—LLY dips toward 805-815 as entries, NVO either reclaiming 55+ or waiting for capitulation near 49-50—gives real actionable structure. The timing is fascinating: LLY earnings Oct 30 into strength, NVO Nov 5 trying to find a floor. I also appreciate the honest risk callouts: FX headwinds for NVO, policy noise for both, and the reminder that supply cadence dominates quarter-to-quarter volatility more than demand. Your point about payor coverage being a patchwork (commercial ahead of Medicare) is critical—that's the actual gating mechanism for TAM expansion. This is the kind of work that separates investors from speculators.

No posts

Ready for more?